NTK and The NTK Project
are properties of Jn Dechereux
Home | Documentation | FAQ.

Vanilla 1.1.8 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.

NTK - Main Forum  »   winexec vs ntk_shellexecute

Bottom of Page

1 to 3 of 3

  1.  
    •  
      CommentAuthorxbasefan
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2010
     
    hi there,
    being of clip4win background, i am still using the winexec function (coming with c4w2ntk.ch), and apparently no problem with it.
    i am wondering if winexec|ntk_winexec is better or worse than ntk_shellexecute in NTK environment?
    should i continue using it or should i change?

    TIA,
    Wilson.
    •  
      CommentAuthorjnd
    • CommentTimeJul 2nd 2010 edited
     
    IMO, this is not really important - it's often a matter of convenience. However, if you are needing some extra features or extended abilities, maybe the RUN command or functions like ntk_run or ntk_shellexecute are a better choice.
    Anyway, you have to know that each of them are basically based upon the NTKCore API: NTK_ShellExecute().

    Bye for now,
    JN
    •  
      CommentAuthorxbasefan
    • CommentTimeJul 2nd 2010
     
    jn,
    thanks for the enlightenment.
    wilson.

1 to 3 of 3

  1.